Host State Agreement Icc

The Court`s personal jurisdiction extends to all individuals who commit offences, regardless of where they are or where the offences have been committed, as long as they are nationals of (1) States Parties to the Rome Statute or (2) States that have recognized the jurisdiction of the Court by making a statement to the Court. [96] As in the case of territorial jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction may be extended by the Security Council when it orders the Court of Justice. [97] South African President Jacob Zuma said the ICC`s perception of “unreasonable” had led to the convening of the AU`s extraordinary summit on 13 October 2015. Botswana is a remarkable supporter of the ICC in Africa. [276] At the summit, the AU did not support the ICC`s proposal for collective withdrawal because the idea was not supported. [277] The summit concluded, however, that sitting heads of state should not be brought to justice and that Kenyan cases should be postponed. Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom said: “We have rejected the ICC`s double standards for justice.” [278] Despite these appeals, the ICC continued to compel William Ruto to participate in his trial. [279] UNC was then asked to consider adjourning the trials of Kenyatta and Ruto by one year,[280] which was refused. [281] In November, the Assembly of States Parties to the ICC responded to requests for exemptions for current heads of state[282] and agreed to consider amending the Rome Statute to address these concerns. [283] The land and financing for the new construction was provided by the Netherlands. [157] In addition, the host country organized and funded the architectural competition, which began at the end of 2008. Article 8 bis defines crimes of aggression. The statute originally provided that the Court of Justice could exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression only after the contracting states had agreed on a definition of the crime and had defined the conditions under which it could be prosecuted.

[4] [89] Such a change was adopted at the first ICC review conference in Kampala, Uganda, in June 2010. However, this amendment provides that the ICC can exercise jurisdiction for the crime of aggression only when two other conditions are met: (1) the amendment came into force for 30 contracting states and (2) on 1 January 2017 or after 1 January 2017, the Assembly of Contracting States voted in favour of granting jurisdiction to the Court. On June 26, 2016, the first condition was met[90] and the parties of state voted for the Court to exercise jurisdiction on December 14, 2017. [91] The Court`s jurisdiction to prosecute assault offences was therefore activated on July 17, 2018. [91] The statute, as amended, defines the crime of aggression as “the planning, preparation, initiation or execution by a person capable of effectively controlling or directing the political or military action of a state, an act of attack which, by its nature, gravity and magnitude, constitutes a clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations.” [92] The statute defines an “act of aggression” as “the use of armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state or in some other way inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.” [93] The article also contains a list of seven acts of aggression identical to those of UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 of 1974, which contain the following acts when committed by one state against another state:[94] The ICC often relies on NGOs to interact with local populations.